어린이집 반편성 기준 개선방안 연구 - 유아반을 중심으로

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author 이정림 -
dc.contributor.author 이미화 -
dc.contributor.author 구자연 -
dc.date.accessioned 2019-11-05T08:43:23Z -
dc.date.available 2019-11-05T08:43:23Z -
dc.date.issued 2013-12-20 -
dc.identifier.uri https://repo.kicce.re.kr/handle/2019.oak/990 -
dc.description.abstract □ Purpose l Currently, childcare centers are allowed to serve a few more children in a class than the maximum number set by childcare regulations. As the concerns regarding the quality of childcare sector have increased, there is a growing need for reducing teacher-child ratio and for reinforcing the class size regulations in childcare centers. The purpose of this study was to review the adequacy of teacher-child ratio in childcare centers, and propose the measures to place teachers accordingly. □ Methods l Data was collected from a survey and in-depth interviews on teacher-child ratio and improvement measure for class size issues in childcare. Survey was completed by directors of childcare centers in Seoul and Gyoung-gi regions (n=148) and teachers serving children ages 3-5 in the centers (n=286). In-depth interviews were conducted with childcare center directors (n=3) and teachers (n=5). □ Results Perceptions on teacher-child ratio l Regarding proper teacher-child ratio by age group, childcare center directors (D) and teachers (T) responded as follows: - Age 3 class - 1:12 (D), 1:11 (T) - Age 4 class - 1:15 (D), 1:14 (T) - Age 5 class - 1:17 (D), 1:16 (T) l For all age groups, adequate teacher-child ratio suggested by teachers was lower than the ratio suggested by directors. l Regarding current status of serving more children than maximum number set by law, directors of public/government-funded childcare centers tended to support the idea of strictly reinforcing the class size regulations more strongly than private center directors (43.6% vs. 21.2% for Age 3; 32.7% vs. 21.3% for Age 4; and 30.9% vs. 21.3% for Age 5, respectively). l All teacher respondents, regardless of auspices, supported the idea of strictly reinforcing class size regulations. l Directors and teachers preferred the idea of using teacher aids assigned to a class (rather than floating teachers) (51.7% and 71.8%, respectively) who can work 3-5 hours a day (49.3% and 70.9%, respectively) all year round (76.7% and 79.1%, respectively). □ Implications l Reduce teacher-child ratio to improve the quality of childcare services l Reinforce the childcare regulations regarding class size and teacher-child ratio l Encourage childcare centers to run classes by age groups l Effectively utilize additional human resources (e.g., teacher aids, assistants, substitute teachers) to support childcare teachers, and devise ways to reduce their excessive workload (e.g, team teaching, 2-shift system). -
dc.description.tableofcontents 요약 I. 서론 Ⅱ. 연구의 배경 Ⅲ. 유아반 편성 기준에 대한 요구 분석 Ⅳ. 정책 제언 참고문헌 부록 -
dc.language kor -
dc.publisher 육아정책연구소 -
dc.title 어린이집 반편성 기준 개선방안 연구 - 유아반을 중심으로 -
dc.title.alternative Determining Class Size and Ratio in Childcare Centers: Focusing on Preschool Classes -
dc.type Report -
dc.citation.volume 연구보고 2013-23 -
dc.citation.startPage 1 -
dc.citation.endPage 90 -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation 이정림. (2013-12-20). 어린이집 반편성 기준 개선방안 연구 - 유아반을 중심으로. 연구보고 2013-23, 1–90. -
dc.type.local 수시연구보고서 -
dc.type.other 연구보고서 -
dc.relation.projectName 어린이집 반편성 기준 개선방안 연구-유아반을 중심으로 -
dc.relation.projectCode OR1309 -
Appears in Collections:
연구보고서 > 3. 수시연구보고서
파일 목록
어린이집 반편성 기준 개선방안 연구_유아반을 중심으로.pdf Download

qrcode

twitter facebook

Items in OAK are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE