어린이집 반편성 기준 개선방안 연구 - 유아반을 중심으로
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이정림 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 이미화 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 구자연 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-05T08:43:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-05T08:43:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-12-20 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repo.kicce.re.kr/handle/2019.oak/990 | - |
dc.description.abstract | □ Purpose l Currently, childcare centers are allowed to serve a few more children in a class than the maximum number set by childcare regulations. As the concerns regarding the quality of childcare sector have increased, there is a growing need for reducing teacher-child ratio and for reinforcing the class size regulations in childcare centers. The purpose of this study was to review the adequacy of teacher-child ratio in childcare centers, and propose the measures to place teachers accordingly. □ Methods l Data was collected from a survey and in-depth interviews on teacher-child ratio and improvement measure for class size issues in childcare. Survey was completed by directors of childcare centers in Seoul and Gyoung-gi regions (n=148) and teachers serving children ages 3-5 in the centers (n=286). In-depth interviews were conducted with childcare center directors (n=3) and teachers (n=5). □ Results Perceptions on teacher-child ratio l Regarding proper teacher-child ratio by age group, childcare center directors (D) and teachers (T) responded as follows: - Age 3 class - 1:12 (D), 1:11 (T) - Age 4 class - 1:15 (D), 1:14 (T) - Age 5 class - 1:17 (D), 1:16 (T) l For all age groups, adequate teacher-child ratio suggested by teachers was lower than the ratio suggested by directors. l Regarding current status of serving more children than maximum number set by law, directors of public/government-funded childcare centers tended to support the idea of strictly reinforcing the class size regulations more strongly than private center directors (43.6% vs. 21.2% for Age 3; 32.7% vs. 21.3% for Age 4; and 30.9% vs. 21.3% for Age 5, respectively). l All teacher respondents, regardless of auspices, supported the idea of strictly reinforcing class size regulations. l Directors and teachers preferred the idea of using teacher aids assigned to a class (rather than floating teachers) (51.7% and 71.8%, respectively) who can work 3-5 hours a day (49.3% and 70.9%, respectively) all year round (76.7% and 79.1%, respectively). □ Implications l Reduce teacher-child ratio to improve the quality of childcare services l Reinforce the childcare regulations regarding class size and teacher-child ratio l Encourage childcare centers to run classes by age groups l Effectively utilize additional human resources (e.g., teacher aids, assistants, substitute teachers) to support childcare teachers, and devise ways to reduce their excessive workload (e.g, team teaching, 2-shift system). | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 요약 I. 서론 Ⅱ. 연구의 배경 Ⅲ. 유아반 편성 기준에 대한 요구 분석 Ⅳ. 정책 제언 참고문헌 부록 | - |
dc.language | kor | - |
dc.publisher | 육아정책연구소 | - |
dc.title | 어린이집 반편성 기준 개선방안 연구 - 유아반을 중심으로 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Determining Class Size and Ratio in Childcare Centers: Focusing on Preschool Classes | - |
dc.type | Report | - |
dc.citation.volume | 연구보고 2013-23 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 90 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 이정림. (2013-12-20). 어린이집 반편성 기준 개선방안 연구 - 유아반을 중심으로. 연구보고 2013-23, 1–90. | - |
dc.type.local | 수시연구보고서 | - |
dc.type.other | 연구보고서 | - |
dc.relation.projectName | 어린이집 반편성 기준 개선방안 연구-유아반을 중심으로 | - |
dc.relation.projectCode | OR1309 | - |